Getting Girls to Put in Work

Presented in General, Classics by theApproach on Monday November 28, 2005

Hope everyone had a lovely Thanksgiving. For all your viewing pleasure, here’s some ways to get a women putting in work to get you.

This will increase one of the three parts of Attraction. If you haven’t read the Model of Attraction, those are:

Value for her life
A sense you’re attainable
Her putting in effort to get you

“New Attraction Model” is available here:

http://www.theapproach.com/art_attraction_model.php

or in my archives, whatever you please.

Some questions from effigyc:
>So I want to talk more about
>the “making her work for you.”

Absolutely.

>Below is my understanding of
>what we’re talking about here,
>feel free to correct me if I’m
>wrong.
>
>We see a girl at a coffee
>shop. We start a
>conversation. We’re making
>her laugh, vibing with her,
>having a good time.

Okay at this point, you already have some value for her life. Showing confidence, fun, maybe a little humor, social savvy, that you’re cool, that you guys can have fun together.

Also since you’re connecting with her (vibing, having a good time) she likely has some sense you’re attainable. If you don’t see any sign of her Auto-Rejection Mechanism kicking in, assume the attainability’s there if you’ve got some connection.

So far, so good, except…

>Now, to
>insure that she’ll want to see
>us again, we’re going to make
>her put some effort into
>things.

… she hasn’t put any work in! Exactly!

This is the Cost/Value Conception. In short, people don’t value things they don’t pay for. A girlfriend of mine takes me out to an expensive restaurant and gets me a $40 glass of wine and I don’t finish it. I buy a bottle of water for myself and I refuse to throw it away before I drink it all.

The more EFFORT you put into getting something, the more you feel like you DESERVE it. That makes you actively want it, and want to pursue it and keep it. If I got given a bottle of water for free, but accidentally dropped it and it rolled under a table, I might just leave it there. But if I BUY the thing (effort) I’ll go get it.

So I feel like I deserve it more. The other thing it does is…

>Thusly, she’ll value
>them more.

Exactly! Great thinking man, your head’s in the right place. When a woman feels like she wants something, she’ll rationalize it’s more valuable to herself. So it’s a cycle, but to make a long story short:

Value for her life + Sense you could be attainable + Effort on her part =ATTRACTED

>The ways we go
>about this are:

There are LOTS of ways to do this. I could fill up 30 pages in a couple hours on how to do this. When I teach this stuff, I go on for quite a while. But a few things you can do:

>Neging - Let’s say we cut her
>off in the middle of something
>she’s saying, and say “Oh,
>you’ve kind of got a little
>booger there.” This would
>certainly embaress the shit
>out of her, and do some
>serious damage to
>”attainablity.” Would it
>however make her start working
>to get you? Is it even
>necissary?

A cardinal rule of negging is it’s supposed to be playful, not an insult. That said, if you ALREADY had some potential value, a neg can get them to work. If they react at all… they’re working to get you basically.

If they test you, they’re putting energy into the interaction to make it go forwards, and giving you an opportunity to pass her test (and we all know what happens when you do that). If she starts qualifying herself, she’s obviously working to get you.

However, if you had no value for her life at all, not potentially any (but don’t be fooled, body language, walking patterns, facial expressions, style, and image can all communicate potential value, not just your words) then she’d just ignore you. That’s actually the worst result you can get from a neg.

BUT if you neg at the wrong time, like if she’s really opening up and you neg her, it’ll tank attainability. That’ll set off her Auto-Rejection Mechanism and she’ll reject herself, which means she’ll shut down. ARM manifests itself different ways, but she might get very rude, might get quiet and walk away, or might go start seeking validation elsewhere. Regardless ARM is a mistake, it means you let attainability get too low and is not a good place to be. But a well-placed neg can get her to start putting work in (also something truly amazing that I learned from Mystery personally was that after he does his 3 neg thing, he then communicates a “You’ve passed” vibe to her and qualifies her. Amazing to see, hard to describe, but he’s framing it like she’s worked for him - Very masterful on his part, he knows his stuff)

>Getting her to verbally
>qaulify herself to you -
>there’s really only two ways I
>can think to do this. One is
>to simply ask her if she likes
>or can do certain things.
>i.e. do you like to go
>camping, or can you cook.

Basic screening questions, yes.

>Two would be to command her to
>qaulify herself. i.e. Style’s
>tell me three interesting
>qaulities you have, or to say
>”Well, its great that you love
>shopping, but isn’t there
>anything else you like to do?”

Okay, that’s a second. There’s lots more ways to get her to verbally qualify herself though. One way would be to disqualify her (see Japanese Nurse LR) on a characteristic she DOESN’T ACTUALLY HAVE. This will get them automatically qualifying themselves 90% of the time at the expense of your attainability (and if executed poorly, your value, since you will look like you don’t have social skills if you say an innocent girl is too wild, etc).

There’s lots of other ways. You can even make a blanket statement like, “Wow it’s a shame so many people watch so much TV these days. I like to relax and veg sometimes, but people give up SO much of the amazing world out there.” Will result in her verbally qualifying herself often.

Disqualify people in general who have a trait she herself doesn’t like, and tie the OPPOSITE to her verbally qualifying.

This is powerful. If she’s a world traveller, saying something like, “God so many people miss out on seeing the world, and I think they wind up being worse lovers and worse in relationships because of it.”

Most people who travel love to rant about people who just “stay in their own backyard all life”. So when you say that because of that they’re worse lovers… it means when she agrees with you and says she travels, she’s saying she’s a good lover and good in relationships. Therefore, she’ll feel like she’s worked for you afterwards.

Remember, all of these components aren’t about having/being/doing them, it’s about the perception of them. Perceived value for her life, perceived attainability, perceived effort put in. She might put no “real” effort in, but if she feels she’s worked hard for you, she’ll want her prize regardless of if she really worked hard or not. Imagine you’re getting ready for a big competition. You train really hard for the competition, days in and days out, sweat and blood. And you win! You’re going to want your prize. Now… what if the competition was fixed, but you don’t know that? You still feel like you worked hard to win, so you still feel attracted to the prize/title/status you got by winning. Even if the “work” that the women put in is “fixed”, and they’re not really working, that can be enough. Is it the best way? No, but it is a way.

>Getting her to physically do
>things. Like give you a
>massage or drive you
>somewhere.

Yes. Asking her to bring a small ingredient for cooking on her way over, or a bottle of wine. Or something unrelated to what you’re doing with her even.

If she says she has to go to the store later, hand her $5 and ask her to buy you a copy of Gentlemen’s Quarterly (magazine) while she’s there. This is actually triple-pronged attack territory: That little technique will increase your value, her sense of your attainability, and the effort she’s put in.

Effort: She’s doing you a favor, working to please you and help you.

Attainability: Many men wouldn’t realize that this technique increases attainability. It does. Any time you make plans past the current moment, it demonstrates you’ve already decided to see her again. Now if she turned out crazy, I’d cut my losses, let her keep the lousy magazine or $5, and bail. But that’s not the way the female mind works… When you’ve got something “on the burner” they feel you’re not going anywhere, and it increases the sense that it’s possible to have you.

Value: You’re confident and help delegate things you need help with to people you trust. You’re not burdening her… picking up a magazine at checkout doesn’t really make her life harder. Plus, it’s GQ, you’re a fashionable guy. You’re not being over the top with your request, just nonchalant (note for guys who dress really, really poorly: Choose a different magazine) about it.

Other “tangible” things she can do for work: Help cook, help clean your place (YES, you can get a woman you just met to help clean your place on a first or second meet, it just takes some game), do anything that furthers your life or appears to please or help you, or getting her to do any little thing.

>So my questions are these:
>
>Am I even on the right page
>here?

Yes, you’re definitely thinking in the right direction. You need to expand your horizons a little bit and think more. I’ve shared maybe 2% of my techniques for getting her to put in work with you here, there’s a lot that can be done. Think about it: What can you do to make her feel like she’s worked to get you?

Have fun with it. Not only will women in your life be more attracted to you if they’re working for you, but you’ll have more productive relationships. Enjoy!

>Are the techniques I’m
>talking about what Dimitri’s
>advocating using?
>
>What are some other ways of
>making her “work” for you?

Oh, there’s lots of things. Again, it’s the perception of her working to get you.

These can be big things, like favors. Obviously paying for you is good. “Hey, you got this one?” at a coffee shop will have her buying your coffee. This tends to be bad for attainability, but good for effort, and it near always works. I’ll often take a girl rollerskating on $2 skating night here. Skate rentals are $3, so it’s $10 for both of us. I say, “Hey, you got this one?” It’s $10, it’s meaningless… but she paid for the date, so now any charming of her I do, she feels like she earned and values a lot more.

Other stuff: Well-phrased and well-framed compliments can actually make it seem like she WORKED to have you open her! It’s amazing, isn’t it? Men often forget that women put in TONS of work to appeal to men. If you’re meeting up with her for a date and she looks really good, you can say, “Wow, I’m impressed. You must’ve taken a lot of time to fix yourself up but that means a lot to me - You look good girl.” You just framed it like she went out of her way to impress you (which she probably did). How about this opener? “I saw you walking by… and I had to say… you look absolutely stunning.” The pace part is her walking, then you HAD to say she looked stunning.

Here’s one that many men won’t identify with or understand. A lot of black guys, when they play the game, they say the woman has to make eye contact before they’ll approach. Player Supreme has written about this, and it’s a fairly standard pimp M.O. Then the guy approaches… SHE made the first move, and that move was EFFORT on her part to get the man. Even something as simple as eye contact can be her putting in work.

Other stuff. “Testing” her on the dance floor/rollerskating rink/wherever. Having her help you with something big in your life. Having her lie to someone fore you (unscrupulous but +effort definitely). The “conspiracy” frame is really good for work, like if you tell her to subtly slip you her number.

How about when you #close and don’t have a pen? Go fetch it yourself? Hell no! Have her get the pen, or play the “Pen Guess” game I created for this very reason.

Say, “Hmmm… let’s make a game of this, we’ll take turns guessing who around here is the most likely person to have a pen. I’ll guess first.” Then you guess a person, and walk up to them and ask if they have a pen. If they do, it’s no different than if you’d just asked them without he game. But if they don’t, now it’s her turn to guess who has a pen, and then go ask that person if she can borrow it.

I originally made up that game to preserve value (because asking multiple people if they have a pen looks poorly) but it increases the effort she’s put in too, ESPECIALLY if the game goes 5 or 6 people deep. And guess what? If she winds up being the one to get the pen, the number is about 60% more solid. Hey, maybe we should even make the first guess someone unlikely to have a pen? ;)

>Effy.

There’s lots of ways to get them feeling like they’ve put in work, Effy. The big thing is to remember to do it. Now some guys will just do this a token amount because they want to get laid. That’s cool, and their game will improve by taking little games I’ve invented, little lines and cues from solid top-notch players, and throwing them in. But if you want to be really superb, you should start demanding that women work to get you. Have standards and make them meet them. Have them help with logistics. Have them work to catch you.

>If you question anything,
>question
>your limitations.

Great quote man. Now get those women a-workin’!

Sebastian

Model of Attraction

Presented in Fundamentals, Natural Game, Classics by theApproach on Tuesday November 22, 2005

This post by Sebastian was the precursor to the VAC Model.

A definition of attraction - and a way to consistently to get attraction from any girl - is long overdue. Perhaps the two most missunderstood parts of the community are attraction and one of the pieces of it, value.

I’ll set the record straight, and give you a gameplan for how to attract any woman in the world, as well as give specific examples of how attraction works. Since many people are familiar with it, I picked Neil Strauss’ New York Times Bestseller The Game for my examples on how attraction works - I’ll use a few excerpts from the book to explain how this all works.

Attraction is something desireable to someone, that much is obvious. But to create the kind of real, almost-tangible attraction that’ll cause a woman to sleep with you, you need two components:

The Two Components of Attraction Are Value and Deservedness.

I will explain both.

“Value” is value for her life, based on her perceptions. What is valuable is unique to every single person, but pattern of what is valuable can easily be seen. Some things are almost always seen as valuable, and some things are almost always seen as detrimental to value. But the value of any given thing to a person is different for that person than another.

What does this mean? A giant script will not appeal to every single woman. At best, a script can mass-appeal to a man’s target audience. Many sorority girls might have similar value for each other, so if you wanted that demographic, a script that’s useful on many could be devised. But for broader categories, like “college girls”, you’ll need knowledge of how value works for different people.

There are many traits that are almost universally valuable (and thus, attractive). These should be almost universally developed, so that you’re perceived as having them with minimal effort on your part. This includes confidence, charisma, leadership, intelligence, quick wit, sharp instincts, health, wealth, a strong sense of survival, purpose, adaptability, and so on. Very, very, very few women find these traits unattractive, so it’s in every man’s best interest to appear to have these.

This can be done in one of three ways.

1. Develop the trait: If you become confident, you will appear confident. If you become healthy, you will appear healthy. Et cetra.

This is the path that takes the longest to achieve out of the three, but is the easiest once you’ve achieved it.

2. Develop the appearance of the trait: “A prince need not possess princely qualities. He merely needs the appearance of princely qualities.” - Niccolo Machiavelli

Machiavelli is largely right. If you’re not confident, nor a leader, it is still in your best interest to develop the body language and walking patterns of a confident leader. This will give you the appearance of these things, the benefit of which is twofold: You’ll be perceived as having the quality (useful in your immediate interactions) and by being perceived as having it, you might actually develop the quality (”fake it ’till you make it” at work). Developing the appearance of a quality you don’t have is actually a great way to help develop that quality.

3. Demonstrate you have the quality any time the occasion arrises. This is the fastest way to show one person you have a trait about you, but the least efficient way to show the world you have a quality. A good example for this would be kino: It demonstrates you’re comfortable with yourself and comfortable around others (among other things).

If a man wants to demonstrate he’s comfortable with himself and around others, one way might be to kino. After he achieves a base proficiency in kinesthetic interaction (kino, touching other people in a normal way), he can do so consciously to appear to be comfortable with himself and around others.

Over time, his kino will become automatic. At his point he’s developed the appearance of the trait, and most people he will meet will perceive him as comfortable with himself and around others.

Finally, if he allows his belief system to develop, he’ll come to actually be comfortable with himself and around other people. At this point, no conscious technique or tactic is necessary: He has simply become a person who is comfortable with himself and around others. Because this is a universally attractive trait, he is now always a more attractive man and he knows it.

Outside of universally attractive things are things that are attractive to specific women. A gold-digger wants money and status. A 28-year old working professional may be looking for a stable husband/father type man. A 34-year old divorcee may be looking for a feeling of youth and excitement. A young girl may want maturity OR want fun and popularity. Or both.

What any given woman wants is different based on the woman. But you can make generalizations. I always ask students what type of relationships they’re looking for, and what their “type” is. Age, ethnicity, nationality, and social class are all ways that you can make an intelligent guess about what is attractive to a woman. It’s why many pick-up artists have to adjust their techniques when moving to a new location. Even in the same nation, such as the cities of Atlanta and New York City, there are some differences in what the majority of people are looking for.

That said, fine-tuning your game to your “type” is great, but a master’s proficiency in pickup will let you adjust what you’re demonstrating to the specific girl you’re with - and know exactly what to demonstrate.

Cultivating Deservedness:

Part of attraction is value. A large part. If you appear to have no value for her life, something that she’d specifically want, than it doesn’t matter how much of the second part, deservedness, you cultivate.

But it is relatively easy to appear to have value. If you have even some semblance of “a life” then you’ve got some value. If you do some basic things to improve your life (or alternatively, the appearance of having improved your life) then value won’t be your problem.

Attraction is not exclusively value. Value is a part of attraction, and necessary for it, but the second necessary component for attraction is deservedness.

Deservedness is broken into two parts: Attainability, and effort. Both require a comprehensive explanation and guidelines on how to produce these feelings in a woman.

Attainability, first, may confuse some. In all of life, people seem to strive for the unattainable. Something just a step beyond them.

But these things always seem to have some attainability to them. Think about it like this: While you may enjoy looking at a centerfold in a magazine, you are more likely to fall madly in love with the girl next door. Though a centerfold prompts a lot of physical attraction in you, you do nothing to actually GET the centerfold (well, most people…).

This comes down to an important concept called the Auto-Rejection Mechanism. In short, if someone believes they have no chance, they won’t try. It’s the reason master pick-up artists often struggle trying to pick up ugly girls: The girls have no sense of entitlement, so they don’t let themselves get attracted and get hurt.

You can see examples with people aiming for a bit more than they have, too. The people that get very attracted to wanting a yacht are people that can either afford it or come close. Rarely will you see someone that is very poor strongly desire a yacht. Since it does not have attainability in their mind, they can not be seduced by the idea.

The second part of deservedness is effort. Specifically effort the woman puts in.

This is all based on the Cost-Value Conception. In short, Cost-Value says this: You will value something that costs a lot over something that costs little, largely irrospective of their real value. If you’ve ever won a stuffed animal at an amusement park or carnival, you know what I’m talking about. While you might not even take one for free if they’re handing them out on the street as a promotion, by winning it at the carnival (putting in effort and probably more money than thing is worth) it gains a lot of value. The cost determines the value.

When a woman is forced to work for something, she will want it more. However, in the beginning, if she sees it as unattainable, she likely won’t want it. This is largely true of men, too. While a man might like and desire a beautiful woman he sees passing, or a model, he’s more likely to grow very attached to a woman he had sex with who broke up with him, or a woman who keeps saying she really likes him as a friend.

To make someone attracted to you, you simply need to have value and for them to feel deservedness. For value, you need value for their life. There are universally valuable/attractive things like confidence, charisma, health, wealth, loyalty, faith in oneself, purpose, fun, leadership, survival ability, and so on, there are also traits that are more or less valuable/attractive at different points in a woman’s life. Some of these, like wealth and fun, are universally good but are larger priorities for some women than others. Other characteristics, like danger, eccentricity, risk-taking, and so on may be very attractive to certain women, but unattractive to others. It is a sad testament that even many traits that are mostly UNattractive are attractive to certain people, such as abuse and control. These people are mentally unhealthy, and though I advise you to stay away from them, it’s worth noting that sometimes negative traits may be attractive to certain types of women at certain points in their lives.

For deservedness, make sure they feel you are attainable. This would mean not demonstrating all kinds of value to them without them knowing why: This makes you look desperate most of the time, but the worst part is that it can make many normal women feel insecure and that you’re unattainable even when you do it well! Solid screening and qualifying can increase their sense of your attainability if you know how to target your questions and responses. The “special advantage” that Vincent is always talking about making her feel like she has is another good way.

The second part of deservedness is having her put in effort. If a woman works for a man, even just a bit, she’ll be more attracted to him and want him more. Over time, you can use this to change the compliance scales between you two and make sure you keep getting compliance out of her. The result will be that she feels she’s earned you and wants to keep you. If you continue to bed a woman for long periods of time, and she isn’t helping you build your lifestyle, then you may run into problems where she isn’t putting in enough effort and doesn’t feel like she’s worked for you, and therefore deserves you. So she loses attraction.

Examples from The Game by Neil Strauss:

I choose The Game by Neil Strauss as a teaching tool for this article. It’s a cool read, and instead of using anecdotes from my own life of which I’m obviously biased, I can use a well-known good guy and objectively point out why people are or aren’t attracted to each other in the book. I’ll use some short excerpts and reference the page numbers, so y’all can read up the background at home if you have a copy.

On pages 312-317, Neil starts doing an interview of Britney Spears, a very coveted celebrity. He gets her phone number in a feat of true prowess, but is waffling on calling her.

THE GAME PAGE 317:
<<<<<<<<<<<
"Just call her," Mystery constantly prodded me. "What do you have to lose? Tell her, 'Can you not look like Britney Spears? We're going to do some crazy shit, and we can't get caught. We're going to wear wigs, climb up to the Hollywood sign, and touch it for good luck."

"If I had met her socially, fine. But this is a work assignment."

"You're playing the game at another level now. When the article is finished, it isn't an assignment anymore. So call her."

But I couldn't do it. If it had been Dalene Kurtis, the Playmate of the Year, I would have called her back in a second. I had no fear of women like that anymore. I felt worthy. I'd proven that over and over since meeting her. But Britney Spears?

One's self-esteem can only grow so much in a year and a half.
>>>>>>>>>>
MY COMMENTS:

You see Neil deciding against calling her because he thinks she’s unattainable. The telltale lines are, “I had no fear of women like that anymore. I felt worthy.” (shows he feels Dalene Kurtis is attainable to him) And “One’s self-esteem can only grow so much in a year and a half.” (shows he doesn’t think Britney is attainable)

Now, if Britney had wanted Neil, she could have fostered a sense of attainability about herself for him. A phone call or two, or perhaps something akin to some of the techniques we use to ground herself as an average person beneath all the celebrity. And if she had done that, Neil would have became much, much attracted to her than he was.

***

Towards the end of The Game, Neil becomes very attracted - and eventually goes completely exclusive for - a woman named Lisa. What did Lisa have that the other girls didn’t? Well, she had value for his life, being beautiful, intelligent, and with a better personality than most of the girls Neil has met. And since Neil is a top-notch Pick-Up Artist, he feels all women are attainable: He’s unlikely to feel an Auto-Rejection Mechanism except on the most elite of celebrities.

But what about work? At this point in the book, Neil is used to getting huge amounts of compliance from the women in his life. He runs his game for a while and they like it. He phase-shifts and kisses them. They begin to fall ga-ga for them, and if necessary, he uses his techniques to blast LMR and bed them. When and how he pleases.

THE GAME PAGE 365
<<<<<<<<<<
I held her eye contact and moved toward her for the kiss, holding the camera in front of us to capture it.

"I'm not kissing you," she barked.

The words scalded my face like hot coffee. There was no girl I couldn't kiss within a half hour of meeting her. What was her problem?

I froze her out and tried again. Nothing.

It is in these moments that, as a PUA, you start to question the work you've done on yourself. You begin to worry that maybe she sees the real you, the one who existed before the silly nickname, the one who wrote poems about this exact situation in high school.

I delivered a moving, impassioned performance of the evolution phase-shift routine. Somewhere in the distance, I heard a thousand PUAs applauding.

"I'm not biting you," she said.

I wasn't through. I told her the most beautiful love story ever written: "On Seeing the 100 Percent Perfect Girl One Beautiful April Morning" by Haruki Murakami. It is about a man and a woman who are soul mates. But when they doubt their connection for a moment and decide not to act on it, they lose each other forever.

She was ice cold.

I tried a hardcore freeze-out: I blew out the candles, turned off the music, turned on the lights, and checked my email.

She climbed into my bed, curled up under the covers, and went to sleep.

I finally I joined her, and we slept on opposite ends of the bed.
>>>>>>>>>>
MY COMMENTS:

There is no doubt at this point in the book that Lisa will end up with Style if she wants him. She has value for his life, he feels she is attainable to him, but he will be made to work for it. If he “catches” her in the end, he will be astronomically more attracted to him than if she had bedded him that evening.

The old addage that a woman must make her man wait to have her for him to respect her isn’t necessarily true. But it is one of the simplest and easiest ways of making a man work to get her and become more attracted.

The only way, the absolutely only way Lisa could lose Neil at this point in the novel is for his sense of attainability to fall off. This would be a difficult proposition, but because Style is a man of some character and self-esteem, he won’t hang around forever if she makes it clear she won’t be his. The value is there. He’s worked for her. Now, if she keeps herself appearing attainable, she can have him when she likes him.

THE GAME PAGE 368:
<<<<<<<<<<
So we [Neil and Lisa] spent another platonic night together. It was driving me crazy. I knew she liked me. But she wouldn't get intimate. I was teetering on the border of being LJBF'ed.

Maybe I just wasn't her type. I imagined her with tattooed, muscle-bound, leather-jacketed Danzig types, not a scrawny metrosexual guy who had to take pickup workshops. She was killing me.

For the first time since I'd learned the word one-itis, I knew that I was doomed. No one ever gets his one-itis. He gets too clingy and needy and blows it. And, sure enough, I blew it.
>>>>>>>>>>
MY COMMENTS:

At this point, Neil is questing whether she’s attainable or not. And then when she blows him off later, leaving him at the airport with a limo, liquor, and a fancy date planned, his sense of her attainability is near-gone. He continues to pursue her, but details on page 372 that he leaves a message for her and she doesn’t call back.

Neil does his thing, and goes on a little tear of his own, sleeping with a bunch of different women. He thinks of Lisa from time to time, but you can even see what happens in the pacing of the book: There’s barely a mention of her for the next 24 pages as he talks about sleeping with other women and all the ProHo drama. Though no one can be sure, pick-up artists would like to think Neil didn’t spend all his time pining over Lisa in the days that passed until he ran into her again. Though this will happen occasionally with women, most of the time high self-esteem men won’t think constantly over a one-itis once the sense of attainability is gone. At the very least, they’re unlikely to take rational action unless the woman first makes a move of her own.

Which Lisa does, incidentally. If you’ve read the book, you know what happens. She shows up in her convertible, and Neil is ecstatic. She expresses interest in him on page 396 and his sense of her attainability is back.

THE GAME PAGE 410:
<<<<<<<<<<
[Strauss:] "So what made you drive up the hill the other day to see me again?"

[Lisa:] "while you were gone, I realized how much I missed you." I loved watching her lips part over her front teeth when she talked. It made me think of salmon on rice. "My friends were making fun of me because I was counting down the days until you came home. I actually went grocery shopping while you were gone so I could cook you food. I don't know why." She hesitated and smiled, as if she were offering information she'd never planned to divulge. "I bought a fresh piece of swordfish and had to throw it away because it went bad."

A warm flush of confidence filled my chest. So I still had a chance with this girl.
>>>>>>>>>>
MY COMMENTS:
Neil, again, sees Lisa as attainable and you can actually see him immediately feel attraction! She says she misses him, and then he thinks about how much he loves watching her lips part over her front teeth. He analogizes it to salmon on rice.

This is going to lead to more effective seduction on her part: She likes him, and with all the work she’s made him put in, she has a definite shot at exclusivity with a top-notch pickup artist if she wants it. Her own “game” is definitely top of the line.

The rest of pages 410 and 411 are provide even better examples. Why did Lisa act the way she did and lose attraction for Neil? She, herself, wasn’t sure about his attainability. She was thankfully sure enough to reengage him, but there was a little mixup that caused her Auto-Rejection Mechanism to set in - and tell a guy that she liked that he had no chance.

She’s not rejecting Neil, she’s rejecting HERSELF! This is what happens when the sense of attainability is removed.

THE GAME PAGE 410
<<<<<<<<<<
"But it's too late," she said. "The window was open with me, and you blew it."

David DeAngelo would have said to go cocky funny here. Ross Jeffries would have said not to buy into her frame. Mystery would have said to punish her. But I had to ask: "How did I blow it?"

"First off, you didn't call me when you came home from Miami. I had to go to you."

"Hold on. I thought you were blowing me off. You never even called while I was away."

"Well, your voice mail said you were out of town and you weren't receiving calls, so I didn't leave a message."

"Yeah, but I would have returned your call. I wanted to hear from you."

"Then you came to Whiskey Bar and hardly talked. And the last straw was when we went to your house to go surfing. I told Sam I was starting to like you again and she said, 'Get over it. When I went up to his room to use the bathroom, I found a used condom on the floor.'"

My brain leaped up and slapped itself. I had been careless: I'd forgotten to throw away the condom I'd used with Isabel. So that's what Sam and she were whispering about in the car on the way to Malibu.

"So then why did you agree to go out with me tonight?"

"You asked me out on a proper date. And you were a little nervous, so I figured you must really be into me."

I propped myself up on the pillows. I was about to say the most AFC thing of my life. "Let me tell you something. The pickup artists have a word they call one-itis. It's a disease that people get when they become obsessed with just one girl. And they never end up with this girl because they get too nervous around her and scare her away."

"So?" she asked.

"So," I said. "You're my one-itis."

We were looking each other in the eyes now. I could see hers sparkle. I knew mine were sparkling. It was time to kiss her.

There were no lines, no routines, no evolution phase-shift--I'd tried them all unsuccessfully anyway. I leaned in. She leaned in. Her eyes closed. My eyes closed. Our lips met. It was just like I'd always thought a kiss was supposed to begin.

For hours, we lay there making out and dissecting the connections and misunderstandings of the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>
MY COMMENTS:

You can see her ARM (Auto-Rejection Mechanism) in motion. “I told Sam I was starting to like you again and she said, ‘Get over it. When I went up to his room to use the bathroom, I found a used condom on the floor.’”

“I told Sam I was starting to like you again” is a classic example of attraction rebuilding. Neil invites Lisa surfing, so Lisa thinks Neil is attainable. Attraction grows. But then Sam tells Lisa about the condom on the floor. Attainability fades. Attraction fades.

BUT, Neil Strauss is a man of exceptional character, and shows why he’s been crowned one of the best pick-up artists of this era. Though he’s not exactly sure why, he knows intuitively that David DeAngelo’s advice is based on making her work for him, which isn’t the answer. Ross and Mystery are suggesting to do things that demonstrate traits of independence and choice, which also isn’t necessary.

So Neil opens up and shows Lisa he’s attainable. He goes as far as to tell her that he’s obsessed with her: And it works. The value for her life was there (Neil’s a great guy with a good career and lots of interesting stuff going on). She’s had to work for him, charming and seducing him. When he shows her that he’s attainable to her, she falls for him.

Deciding to be faithful now, Strauss sets about dumping his other girlfriends.

THE GAME PAGE 411:
<<<<<<<<<<
"So you're choosing her over me?" Isabel asked angrily.

"It's not an intellectual choice."

"Is she better in bed or something?"

"I don't know. We've only kissed."

"So you made out with some girl," she said, with a weak attempt at a cruel laugh, "and you want to get rid of me now."

"It's not that I want to get rid of you. I'd still like to see you, but as a friend." I could hear the word pierce her heart like a dagger, as it had my own heart so many times before I'd joined the community.

"But I love you."

How could she love me? She needed to go fuck a dozen other guys to get over her one-itis.

"I'm sorry," I said. And I was.

There is a downside to casual sex: Sometimes it stops being casual. People develop a desire for something more. And when one person's expectations don't match the other person's, then whoever holds the highest expectations suffers. There is no such thing as cheap sex. It always comes with a price.
>>>>>>>>>>
MY COMMENTS:

Neil, in a way, touches on value and working for someone here. Neil has more value for Isabel’s life than Isabel has for Neil’s life. And Isabel has worked harder for him (been more compliant for lower rewards, as per Vincent DiCarlo’s Value/Compliance model) than he has for her. The two combined together means she feels she deserves him and is attracted to him - so of course it hurts. Many men that read this will understand how Isabel felt.

While it’s not nearly as common for women to feel this pain as men, it does happen. She was attracted to him: Neil had value for Isabel’s life, and she felt she deserved him (he was attainable because she had already been bedding him, she worked to get him by accepting terms she didn’t like such as non-exclusivity).

Or I could be completely, totally off-base with my comments, and other stuff was going on.

Though I won’t ruin the specifics, I’ll let you know there is a happily-ever-after to this book, and Neil and Lisa do metaphorically ride off into the sunset together.

As for creating attraction in your own life, remember this formula:

Attraction = Value + Deservedness

Value is the value for her life. Cultivate the appearance of all universally attractive traits, and selectively demonstrate specific traits to specific women.

Deservedness is comprised of two elements. The first is attainability: If a woman thinks you are unattainable, her Auto-Rejection Mechanism will kick in. She’ll blow you off so she doesn’t feel hurt, and then backwards-rationalize it, halting attraction from growing and sometimes killing it all off. So you must let feel that you are potentially attainable. Conscious tactics for this include screening, qualifying, and making her feel like she has a special advantage. It can also be accomplished with looks and certain body language and tonality.

The second part of deservedness is the woman working to earn you, the cost/value conception. When someone works hard for something, they feel like it should be belong to them and it’s to be prized. She’ll feel like she deserves to be with you and she’ll be attracted to you because of it.

Use these teachings wisely, friend. I documented some examples and you can see how negative emotions ran through some good people because of some missteps in attracting each other. These techniques can be a bit powerful and can mess with a woman’s head, so do make sure to, as Neil puts it, not violate Ross Jeffries’ only ethical rule of seduction: Leave her better than you found her.

Google Map of Site Visitors

Visit theApproach's Official Site